A new star is on the rise in the Data analytics
horizon. Big guns who have monopolized the markets and ran the show the way
they liked are now trembling before the sheer lightning-speed and performance
of SAP HANA.
Short for High-performance Analytics
Appliance, HANA combines a lot of what is “future technology” for its competitors,
and SAP has done an excellent job pulling it off. In fact
the entrance of HANA was so unexpected, even the competitors rolled out by
Oracle and the lots are in no way a match for it.
SAP first announced its plans for working
on in-memory databases at the SAPPHIRE conference in May 2011, and was
immediately met with sharp criticism or rather sarcasm! Oracle CEO Larry
Ellison, openly mocked SAP's goals during an event in January.
"Get me the name of their
pharmacist," Ellison said at the time. "I mean, I know a lot about
in-memory databases. In fact, we have the leading in-memory database, TimesTen.
This is nonsense. There is no in-memory technology anywhere near ready to take
the place of a relational database. It's a complete fantasy on their part."
In-memory databases store information in a
system's main memory, instead of on disk, providing a performance boost. The
technology, which Plattner also discussed at last year's Sapphire event, is now
beginning to be reflected in SAP BI (business intelligence) products, such as
BusinessObjects Explorer.
HANA is available in appliance form on
hardware from a number of vendors. Built in part upon existing products at SAP,
HANA places data to be processed in RAM, versus reading it off disks, which
provides a performance boost.
SAP HANA runs on high-end commodity
hardware and provided you have enough memory to run your database, it doesn’t
matter what you run it on from a technology standpoint.
Initial certified hardware solutions are
still quite expensive – I priced up a 1TB Dell system for $75k – not including
disk storage, which will probably double that number at retail price, so think
$150k. But really that’s nothing compared to what an equivalent 10TB database
cost 10 years ago (SAP HANA compresses 10:1 compared to databases back then).
And worryingly for Oracle, Teradata, IBM
and HP, it is nothing compared to what Mainframe or Teradata/Exadata hardware
costs.
While HANA so far is positioned primarily
for analytic workloads, SAP has long-term designs of porting its flagship
Business Suite to the platform, a move that would provide an alternative for
SAP customers currently running their transactional systems on databases from
Oracle or IBM.
SAP had previously released a Strategic
Workforce Planning application for HANA, which allows companies to analyze the
effect of changes to their employee base. The new Smart Meter Analytics product
will help utilities probe smart meter data for deep insights into customer
energy usage patterns, allowing for improved system load forecasting,
specialized marketing programs and other benefits, SAP said.
What does this mean for the future state of
high-end systems? And in the emerging business world where the Big Data
challenge is not just an isolated incident but a ubiquitous condition, is it
not reasonable to expect that more and more customers will require more and
more of these extremely high-performance machines?
REAL LIFE CASE-STUDYS
What does improved analytics speed mean for
business? What is the value added to your business by pulling off super-fast
reports and analysis from your databases? What if you could do cost and
profitability analyses across millions of records spanning three years and
thousands of retail outlets in less than 5 seconds—that is, in real-time—instead
of in a few days? How would that change the ways in which you engage with
customers, exploit the power of dynamic pricing, squeeze inventory volumes, and
accelerate your moves into new markets?
How about a factor of 1,000: what if your
systems could give you deep and granular insights into every phase of your
business 1,000 times faster than they currently do—how would you exploit all
that speed, all that customer-driven foresight, all that potential?
Only a year or so ago, all of these
questions would have been largely theoretical simply because traditional IT
systems and architectures were limited to delivering only incremental increases
in performance, and gains of 25% or 35% were huge.
HANA enhances or rather expands old-school
analytics in five dimensions. In the words of SAP executive board member Vishal Sikka, these
are:
1)Are we able to ask complex questions? This,
Sikka said, means that value is unlocked not merely by crunching through the
same numbers more quickly than before, but by “going deeper”: analyzing more
records over more time with more variables, and getting answers hundreds or
thousands of times faster. 2) Can we ask an unlimited range of questions without having to submit them in advance? Current systems require some preliminary staging of anticipated data sets, which greatly limits the types of questions that can be asked and, more importantly, the types of insights that can be gained. HANA, Sikka said, has no such limitations.
3) Can we interactively arrive at questions? In the old model, a limited set of questions is submitted to an expert who then triggers the analysis in isolation—conversely, Sikka is describing an entirely new dynamic that allows multiple people to look at and question the incoming results on the fly from an unlimited set of perspectives.
4) Are we able to ask questions across data sets that are not only huge, but come in various types: structured and unstructured, month-old and real-time? With absolutely no limitations?
5) And, can people from across the organization—not just BI black-belts—make these interactive inquiries in real time and get real-time answers? Can businesses finally unlock the potential and power within their data that for too long have been trapped in traditional systems that, intentionally or otherwise, give higher priority to internal processes than to customer requirements?
It all depends on which of these dimensions
you chose to exploit, and how you go about doing it.
“Our friends at Colgate told me that with
their live Hana system, they are now able to run some operational reports 1,000
times faster than before,” said VishalSikka during his keynote speech at SAP’s
China SAPPHIRE NOW event in Beijing. The list doesn’t end there.
Nongfu Spring, a rapidly growing
bottled-water company based in China whose use of HANA has enabled it to cut
its calculation of transportation costs from 24 hours to 3.8 seconds, or more
than 15,000x.
Even more astounding is the achievement of is
Yodobashi, the electronics retailer in Japan, where 5 million of its 22 million
customers are part of the company’s loyalty program. The calculation for
rewards and incentives earned by those 5 million loyalty-club members used to
take 3 days—but with HANA, it now takes 2 seconds. That’s an improvement of
125,000 times!
As a result, Yodobashi can now engage
immediately and more intimately with those 5 million loyalty-club members while
they’re still in the store and more likely to buy, which is a massive
transformation in how the company can enhance its interactions with its best
customers in real time.
“Yodobashi hits 3 of the 5 dimensions we
have laid out,” Sikka said, “so just imagine what can happen if a company is
able to execute across all five dimensions.”
In short term, we can see IBM posting
higher profits from its mainframe sales, HP is in all sorts of organizational
troubles and Oracle is focusing on Exadata. But the Mainframe market is set to
start tailing off by 2015. Oracle already has an in-memory product called
TimesTen in developement, but it is highly doubtful if it will be able to
compete with HANA. As for Teradata, they need to realize the big challenge
posed before them.
Post a Comment